DEVELOPING STUDENT AGENCY THROUGH ONLINE DIDACTIC STRATEGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION. SMALL GROUPS VERSUS LARGE GROUPS
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers and students were relocated in the digital space. In this study, we focus on two groups of students and two types of courses: electives on Romanian as a Foreign Language in Germany and seminars on the Grammatical Structure of the English Grammar in Romania. We analyse the role that student agency plays in the online teaching process. For this purpose, we applied a survey to analyse the effectiveness of the didactic strategies used with small groups in comparison with large groups. The findings of this study show that remote instruction at the university level during seminars/elective courses for small groups can be as efficient as on-site instruction for the learning process and, implicitly, for student agency development. Regarding large groups, the study shows that remote instruction can, at times, be even more efficient than face-to-face teaching, especially regarding student agency development.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Díaz, J. C. (2017). Exploring the Role of Technology through Collaborative Learning in Ecuadorian Language Education. INNOVA Research Journal 2 (10): 1–11.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall S. (2019). Understanding student learning. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Enhancing Academic Practice, eds. H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, S. Marshall (London and New York: Routledge): 8–27. Retrieved 21. 5. 2022. URL:
Grasha, A. F. (1994). A Matter of Style: The Teacher as Expert, Formal Authority, Personal Model, Facilitator, and Delegator. College Teaching 42 (4): 142–149. Retrieved 26. 5. 2022. URL:
Griffths, S. (2019). Teaching and learning in small groups, in A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Enhancing Academic Practice, eds. H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, S. Marshall (London and New York: Routledge): 72–85. Retrieved 28. 5. 2022. URL:
Johnson, B., Macneill, S. & Smyth, K. (2018). Conceptualising the Digital University. The Intersection of Policy, Pedagogy and Practice in Digital Education and Learning Series. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jorge, R., Hanham, J. & Meier, C. (2018). A framework for digital media literacies for teaching and learning in higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media 15 (4): 176–190.
Klemenčič, M. (2015). What is student agency? An ontological exploration in the context of research on student engagement, in Student engagement in Europe: society, higher education and student governance, eds. M. Klemencic, S. Bergan and R. Primozic (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing): 11–29.
Lindgren, R., McDaniel, R. (2012). Transforming Online Learning through Narrative and Student Agency. Educational Technology & Society 15 (4): 344–355.
Prince, M. & Felder, R. (2007). The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning. Journal of College Science Teaching 36 (5): 14–20. Retrieved 21. 5. 2022. URL:
Negoescu, A., Boștină-Bratu, S. (2016) Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages with ICT. Buletin Științific 1 (41): 25–31. Retrieved 1. 6. 2022. URL:
Resta, P., Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review 19 (1): 65–83.
Reeve, J. & Ching-Mei, T. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (4): 257–267.
Zeiser, K., Scholz, C. & Cirks, V. (2018). Maximizing Student Agency. Implementing and Measuring Student-Centered Learning Practices, AIR American Institutes for Research. Retrieved 6. 8. 2022. URL:
Online Resources:
OECD. Better Policies for Better Lives (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual Learning Framework. Student Agency for 2030. Retrieved 5. 5. 2022. URL:
Qureshi, M. (2020). How To Build Student Agency In 2020. Retrieved 6. 5. 2022. URL: