THE INFLUENCE OF INPUT ON ORTHOGRAPHIC ACHIEVEMENT OF PHILOLOGY STUDENTS OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

Main Article Content

Лука М. Меденица

Abstract

Studies dealing with the effects of input on second language learning achievements in both school and academic contexts attract considerable interest in many countries. However, in our opinion, the area has not been researched to its full potential in Serbia. Thus, this paper sets out to discover factors that influence the orthographic achievements of Russian language students. A total of thirty-three respondents took part in this research and they were all third-year students of the Faculty of Philology at the University of Belgrade. In an attempt to examine input as a factor that can improve students’ orthographic achievements, we formed two student groups – the experimental and the control group, on the basis of their previous exposure to L2 and their results on the initial assessment test. The initial and final testing results were compared to evaluate the role of the input factor in students’ orthographic achievements. Our work further suggests that extended exposure to extracurricular input impacts the orthographic achievement of respondents. Finally, our result has led us to conclude that input in the period preceding the initial testing offered compelling signals for predicting students’ achievement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Меденица, Л. М. (2021). THE INFLUENCE OF INPUT ON ORTHOGRAPHIC ACHIEVEMENT OF PHILOLOGY STUDENTS OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE. Methodical Perspectives, 12(12), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.19090/mv.2021.12.305-317
Section
НАСТАВА СТРАНИХ ЈЕЗИКА, КЊИЖЕВНОСТИ И КУЛТУРА

References

Carroll, S. (1999). Putting input in its proper place. Second Language Research 15 (4): 337–388.

Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners’ processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 1–14.

Ellis, N. (1994). Consciousness in Second Language Learning: Psychological Perspectives on the Role of Conscious Processes in Vocabulary Acquisition. Aila Review 11: 37–56.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hu, M., Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 13 (1): 403–430.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Harlow: Longman.

Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading. Westport, CT: Heinemann and Libraries Unlimited.

Krashen, S., Lee, S. Y., Lao, C. (2017). Comprehensible and Compelling: The Causes and Effects of Free Voluntary Reading. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.

Renandya, W. A., Jacobs, G. M., Krashen, S., Ong, C. H. M. (2019). The power of reading: Case histories of second and foreign language readers. Language and Language Teaching 8 (1): 10–14.

Stipančević, A. (2020). Sprachförderung durch extensives Lesen und Hören im universitären DaF-Unterricht. Методички видици 11: 151–167.

Гинич, Е., Айджанович, Н., Меденица, Л. (2020). Современное положение русского языка в высших учебных заведениях Сербии, у Положај словенских језика, књижевности и култура на универзитетима у свету. Округли сто Комисије за наставу словенских језика и књижевности Међународног комитета слависта, ур. Љ. Бајић, Ј. Гинић, Н. Станковић Шошо (Београд: Филолошки факултет Универзитета у Београду): 18–47 [Ginich, E., Aĭdzhanovich, N., Medenit͡sa, L. Sovremennoe polozhenie russkogo јаzyka v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniiјаkh Serbii, u Položaj slovenskih jezika, književnosti i kultura na univerzitetima u svetu. Okrugli sto Komisije za nastavu slovenskih jezika i književnosti Međunarodnog komiteta slavista, ur. Lj. Bajić, J. Ginić, N. Stanković Šošo (Beograd: Filološki fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu): 18–47].