TEACHING SERBIAN LEARNERS ENGLISH PHRASAL VERBS: THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH VS. THE COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC APPROACH

Main Article Content

Srđan M. Gajdoš

Abstract

This study examines the results obtained by using the traditional and the cognitive approach to teaching phrasal verbs. The control group was taught phrasal verbs using the traditional way i.e. by providing a direct translation into Serbian. In the experimental group the author presented the verbs by explaining the meanings of the very particles and the meanings they develop. Both groups were given a test immediately after they received input. They were also tested on the meanings of untaught phrasal verbs three weeks later. Utilising the cognitive approach helped the students learn the phrasal verbs more successfully. The students who knew various meanings of the particles were able to understand the meanings of the whole phrasal verbs better. The experimental group was able to predict the meanings of the untaught phrasal verbs in the delayed test better than the control group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gajdoš, S. M. (2018). TEACHING SERBIAN LEARNERS ENGLISH PHRASAL VERBS: THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH VS. THE COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC APPROACH. Methodical Perspectives, 8(8), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.19090/mv.2017.8.175-193
Section
НАСТАВА СТРАНИХ ЈЕЗИКА, КЊИЖЕВНОСТИ И КУЛТУРА

References

Cambridge International Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. (1997). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (1980). A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V, Bergen, B. K, Zinken, J. (2007). “The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An Overview”, in The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. V. Evans, B. K. Bergen & J. Zinken (London: Equinox): 1-36.
Ganji, M. (2011). “The Best Way to Teach Phrasal Verbs: Translation, Sentential Contextualization or Metaphorical Conceptualization?”, Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1(11): 1497-1506.
Kovacs, É. (2011). “The Traditional Vs. Cognitive Approach to English Phrasal Verbs”. Publicationes Universitatis Miskolcinensis. Sectio Philosophica 16 (1): 141-160.
Marks, J. (2005). “Phrasaled out? Don’t worry! Help is at hand”, in MED Magazine Issue 32. Accessed 15 June 2009. URL: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/MED-Magazine/july-2005/32-Feature-Phrasaled-out.htm2005.
Moon, R. (2005). “Metaphor and Phrasal Verbs”, in Macmillan Phrasal Verbs Plus. Language Study, ed. M. Rundell (Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing): LS 5.
Morgan, P. S. (1997): “Figuring Out Figure Out: Metaphor and the Semantics of the English
Verb-Particle Construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4): 327-357.
Tyler, A. & Evans, V. (2004). “Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Pedagogical Grammar: The Case of Over”, in Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, ed. M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter): 257-280.

Most read articles by the same author(s)