UTICAJ DOMAĆEG ZADATKA NA KVALITET PROCESA UČENJA STRANOG JEZIKA NA RANOM UZRASTU
Главни садржај чланка
Сажетак
U vreme kada je srpski obrazovni sistem u dubokoj krizi, potrebno je razmotriti sve aspekte nastavnog rada koji bi mogli doprineti blagovremenom izlasku iz nje. Cilj ovog rada je da navede sadašnje, ali i buduće nastavnike stranih jezika da, kroz refleksivnu praksu, preispituju ustaljene obrazovne procese i da ih konstantno unapređuju, kako bi se kvalitet obrazovanja u našoj zemlji podigao na viši nivo, što bi neminovno vodilo i do podizanja opšte kulturološke i pedagoške svesti. Jedna od ovakvih postojećih praksi je i zadavanje domaćih zadataka po ustaljenom obrascu, bez posvećivanja previše pažnje ciljevima i svrsi takvih zadataka, kao i bez posebnog promišljanja o posledicama neadekvatno osmišljenih aktivnosti na motivaciju i stavove učenika na ranom uzrastu prema stranom jeziku koji uče, ali i na samo njihovo znanje ciljnog jezika (Holland i dr. 2021). S druge strane, smislene i svrsishodne aktivnosti, zadate u pravom trenutku mogu samo doprineti podizanju kvaliteta nastave, te će u radu biti date smernice koje u ovome mogu pomoći nastavnicima stranog jezika.
Downloads
Детаљи чланка
Референце
Abín, A., Pasarín-Lavín, T., García, T., Núñez, J. C., Rodríguez, C. (2022). Homework and dealing with diversity: An empirical review, in Handbook Of Homework: Theoretical Principles and Practical Applications, ed. S. Rodríguez Martínez, A. Valle Arias, I. Piñeiro Aguín & B. Regueiro Fernández (New York: Nova Science Publishers): 89124.
Adam, V. M., Tai, R. H., Xitao, F. (2012). When is homework worth the time? Evaluating the association between homework and achievement in high school science and math. The High School Journal 96 (1): 5272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2012.0015
Bekker C. I., Rothmann, S., Kloppers, M. M. (2023). The happy learner: Effects of academic boredom, burnout, and engagement. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974486
Bennet, C. A. (2017). “Most Won’t Do It!” Examining homework as a structure for learning in a diverse middle school. American Secondary Education 45 (2): 2238.
Cooper, H. M. (1989). Homework. New York: Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11578-000
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research 76 (1): 162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
Cunha, J., Martins, J., Almeida, S., Núñez, J. C., Rosário, P. (2022). The role of the perceived usefulness of teacher feedback on elementary students’ homework engagement, in Handbook of Homework: Theoretical principles and practical applications, ed. S. Rodríguez Martínez, A. Valle Arias, I. Piñeiro Aguín & B. Regueiro Fernández (New York: Nova Science Publishers): 6389.
Dueck, M. (2014). Grading smarter, not harder, assessment strategies that motivate kids and help them learn. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Eckhoff, A. (2023). Embracing alternatives to homework in early childhood: Research and pedagogies. New York/London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003213376
Fernández-Alonso, R., Muñiz, J. (2022). Homework in international large-scale assessments: the role of student attitudes and motivations, in Handbook of Homework: Theoretical principles and practical applications, ed. S. Rodríguez Martínez, A. Valle Arias, I. Piñeiro Aguín & B. Regueiro Fernández (New York: Nova Science Publishers): 125156.
Holland, M., Courtney, M., Vergara, J., McIntyre, D., Nix, S., Marion, A., Shergill, G. (2021). Homework and children in grades 3–6: Purpose, policy and non-academic impact. Child Youth Care Forum 50: 631–651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-021-09602-8
Hong, E., Milgram, R. M. (2000). Homework: Motivation and learning preference. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400666254
Ioannou-Georgiou, S., Pavlou, P. (2003). Assessing young learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, I., Buzukashvili, T., Feingold, L. (2012). Homework stress: Construct validation of a measure. The Journal of Experimental Education 80 (4): 405–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.610389
Kaye, C., Haynes Write, J. (eds). (2023). Third-space exploration in education. Pennsylvania: IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8402-9
Kidwell, V. (2004). Homework. London: Continuum.
Kohn, A. (2006). The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
Kumar Jha, A. (2006). Homework education: A powerful tool of learning. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.
McGregor, S. A., Knoll, M. A. (2015). The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a framework for understanding parental experiences with homework. Educational Psychology in Practice 31 (4): 335353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2015.1065472
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research 78 (4): 10391101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325185
Paulu, N. (1996). Helping your child with homework. Washington, DC: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
Peltier, C. P. (2011). A comparative study of teachers’ attitudes and practices regarding homework in the elementary, middle, and high school grades. Hattiesburg: The University of Southern Mississippi.
Power, T. J., Karustis, J. L., Habboushe, D. F. (2001). Homework success for children with ADHD. New York: The Guilford Press.
Pressman, R. M., Sugarman, D. B., Nemon, M. L., Desjarlais, J., Owens, J. A., Schettini-Evans, A. (2015). Homework and family stress: With consideration of parents’ self-confidence, educational level, and cultural background. The American Journal of Family Therapy 43 (4): 297–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2015.1061407
Prošić-Santovac, D., Rixon, S. (eds). (2019). Integrating assessment into early language learning and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/PROSIC4818
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21 (1): 87111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586356
Reilly, V., Ward, S. M. (1997). Very young learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ronning, M. (2011). Who benefits from homework assignments? Economics of Education Review 30 (1): 55–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.07.001
Ryba, T. V., Stambulova, N. B., Selänne, H., Aunola, K., Nurmi, J. E. (2017). “Sport has always been first for me” but “all my free time is spent doing homework”: Dual career styles in late adolescence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 33: 131140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.08.011
Sardabi-Kia, M., Ghajarieh, A. (2023). The role of motivational strategies on young EFL learners’ basic psychological needs: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 10 (1): 1–23.
Stern, J. (2009). Getting the buggers to do their homework. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Van Droogenbroeck, F., Spruyt, B., Vanroelen, C. (2014). Burnout among senior teachers: Investigating the role of workload and interpersonal relationships at work. Teaching and Teacher Education 43: 99109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.005
Vatterott, C. (2009). Rethinking homework: Best practices that support diverse needs. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Walker, J. M., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Whetsel, D. R., Green, C. L. (2004). Parental involvement in homework: A review of current research and its implications for teachers, after school program staff, and parent leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
Washburne, C. (1937). How Much Homework? Parents 16–17: 68–71.
Wildman, P. R. (1968). Homework pressures. Peabody Journal of Education 45 (4): 202204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01619566809537528
Xu, J., Guo, S., Feng, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Núñez, J. C., Fan, H. (2024). Parental Homework Involvement and Students´Achievement: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Psicothema 36 (1): 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/IP.24.2092426