TRANSDISCIPLINARNI PRISTUP OBRAZOVANJU NASTAVNIKA STRANIH JEZIKA: ZNANJE, UČEŠĆE I OSNAŽIVANJE U FORMIRANJU ZAJEDNICA ZNANJA
Главни садржај чланка
Сажетак
Iako pristupi učenju i nastavi stranih jezika poslednjih decenija predstavljaju jedno od najinovativnijih i najrazvijenijih oblasti interdisciplinarnih i transdisciplinarnih akademskih aktivnosti u primenjenoj lingvistici (Savet Evrope 2001, 2018, 2020; Filipović 2015b, 2019), obrazovanju nastavnika stranih jezika se još uvek ne posvećuje dovoljna pažnja. U okviru transdisciplinarne paradigme, obrazovanje nastavnika stranih jezika zasniva se na konstruktivizmu i konektivizmu u učionici kao i na interakciji sa svim zainteresovanim stranama. Takva promena pristupa nužno podrazumeva prelaz sa tradicionalne jezičke politike odozgo-nadole, zasnovane na jezičkom menadžmentu (Spolski 2009) u smeru jezičkog liderstva, odnosno jezičke politike odozdo-nagore (Filipović 2015a, 2015b; Filipović & Đurić 2021, itd.). Transdisciplinarni pristup obrazovanju nastavnika stranih jezika može značajno poboljšati ishode učenika na mlađem uzrastu jer otvara prostor za angažovanje čitave zajednice i situirano i distribuirano učenje i nastavu u procesu sazrevanja, kada deca još uvek nisu „izložena” tradicionalnim obrazovnim ideologijama.
Downloads
Детаљи чланка
Референце
Alvargonzáles, D. (2011). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity and the the sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25(4): 387–403.
Cangialiosi, K., & E. Bledsoe E. (2021). Open science and education practices ontology. Accessed 30 November 2022. URL: <https://qubeshub.org/publications/2224/1>.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Daneshpour, H., Kwegyir-Afful, E. (2022). Analysing transdisciplinary education: a scoping review. Science and education 31: 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00277
Denzin N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction, in The Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications): 1–32.
Filipović, J. (2015a). Transdisciplinary approach to language study. The complexity theory perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Filipović, J. (2015b). Language education policies and foreign language teacher education: agencies, practices and perspectives. Filološki pregled / Revue de Philologie 42: 41–52.
Filipović, J. (2019). Transdisciplinary qualitative paradigm in applied linguistics: autoethnography, participatory action research and minority language teaching and learning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 32(5): 493–509.
Filipović, J., Đurić, Lj. (2021). Early childhood foreign language learning and teaching in Serbia: a critical overview of language education policy and plannning in varying historical contexts, in Early language learning policy in the 21st centrury. An international perspective, ed. S. Zein & M. R. Coady (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature): 61–84.
Filipović, J., Milojević, Z., Hoti, D., Vasić-Nikolić, M., Petrović, M. (2022). Priručnik za podučavanje i učenje u 21. veku. (Niš: Nauči me). Accessed on 14 January 2024. URL: <https://www.nauci.me/prirucnik-za-ucenje-i-poducavanje-u-21-veku/>.
Freire, P. (1999). The banking concept of education, in Ways of reading, ed. D. Bartholomae and A. Petrosky (New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s).
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. 30th anniversary edition. New York/London: Continuum.
Goodman, D. (2011). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating privileged groups (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Harjanne, P., Tella, S. (2007). Foreign language didactics, foreign language teaching and transdisciplinary affordances, in Foreign languages and multicultural perspectives in the European context; Fremdsprachen und multikulturelle Perspektiven im europäischen Kontext, ed. A. Koskensalo, J. Smeds, P. Kaikkonen, V. Kohonen (Dichtung – Wahrheit – Sprache. Berlin: LITVerlag): 197–225.
Jovanović, A., Šifrar Kalan, M., Mastilo, M., Kovač, J. (2022). Profedepeques. La guía para la enseñanza temprana del español como lengua extranjera. Beograd: Asociación de Profesores de Español de Serbia (APES) & Filološki fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Kentli, F. D. (2009). Comparison of hidden curriculum theories. European Journal of Educational Studies 1(2): 83–88.
Longino, H. 2019. The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta (Stanford: University). Accessed on 14 January 2024. URL: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/scientific-knowledge-social>.
Norton, B., Toohey, L. (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Petrović, M. (2022). Umesto zaključka – metaforička slika drugačijeg obrazovanja, u Priručnik za podučavanje i učenje u 21. veku, ur. J. Filipović, Z. Milojević, D. Hoti, M. Vasić-Nikolić, M. Petrović (Niš: Nauči me): 77–81. Accessed on 14 January 2024. URL: <https://www.nauci.me/prirucnik-za-ucenje-i-poducavanje-u-21-veku/>.
Phelan, S. E. (2001). What is complexity science, really? Emergence 3(1): 120–136.
Riolfi, C., Barzotto, V. H. (eds.). (2012). Sem choro nem vela: carta aos professores que ainda vão nascer. São Paolo: Paulistana.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL) 2. Accessed on 14 January 2024. URL: <http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm>.
Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Tella, S. (2005). Multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary affordances in foreign language education: From singularity to multiplicity, in Multicultural communities, multilingual practice: Monikulttuuriset yhteisöt, monikielinen käytäntö, ed. J. Smeds, K. Sarmavuori, E. Laakkonen, R. de Cillia (Turku: Annales Universitatis Turkuensis): 67–88.
Thompson Klein, J. (2001). Interdisciplinarity and the prospect of complexity: The test of theory. Issues in Intergrative Studies 19: 43–57.
Uljens, M. (1997). School didactics and learning: A school didactic model framing an analysis of pedagogical implications of learning theory. Hove: Psychology Press.
Vez, J. M. (2008). European policies in TEFL Teacher Education. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 1: 1–8.
Watts, L., Hodgson, D. (2019). Social justice. Theory and practice for social work. Critical and philosophical perspectives. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Wildman, S. M., Davis, A. D. (2000). Language and silence: Making systems of privilege, in Readings in diversity and social justice, ed. M. Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castañeda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters, X. Zúñiga (New York and London: Routledge): 50–60.